Accede a todas las noticias del fútbol Internacional. ¡Todo el fútbol internacional, aquí!

Table toppers Manchester City take on Arsenal in match week 16 of the Premier League when the teams clash on Sunday, December 18, 2011.

Man City suffered their first loss of the league season when they went down 2-1 away at Chelsea, in match week 15. Lampard became an instant hero for the home side when he came off the bench to score the match winner seven minutes before time. The sides were locked at 1-1 after Balotelli’s early lead for City was neutralised shortly before the interval on the back of Raul Meireles’ strike. City began explosively with waves of attack in the first half hour to exploit Chelsea’s porous defence. It culminated in Balotelli’s goal, when Aguero cut in from the right to relay the ball past Terry to Aguero who in turn passed it to Balotelli to do the rest. At the end of the day, City would have rued their many missed scoring opportunities in the first half when the home side’s defence was all at sea, trying to cope with the marauding City attack.

In match week 15, Arsenal registered a 1-0 victory over Everton, in a match hosted by Gunners at the Emirates. Robin Van Persie – who else – scored the only goal of the game to give Arsenal something to celebrate their 125th anniversary by. Van Persie’s spectacular volley on 71 minutes brought relief to home fans who were frustrated by the home side’s many missed chances.

Head to head, in the last 10 years, Man City and Arsenal have met in 20 league games, with Arsenal winning on 14 occasions and City on 3, with the remaining games ending in stalemates. The last time these teams met was in January 2011; that match played at the Emirates ended in a goalless stalemate.

Man City have won 8, and drawn and lost 1 each of their last 10 league matches, while Arsenal have identically won 8 and drawn and lost 1 each of their last 10 games.

Currently at the top of the table, City have hosted 7 home games, this season, winning all 7; the Gunners who are 5th placed on the league table have had 3 wins, 1 draw and 3 losses, in their 7 away games.

With Chelsea causing City’s title bid a mild jolt in match week 15, the Manchester squad will have a point or more to prove against the Gunners whose ramshackle defence could be put to its stiffest test yet.

Man City’s starting eleven against Chelsea: Joe Hart, Pablo Zabaleta, Joleon Lescott, Vincent Kompany, Gael Clichy, James Milner, Gnegneri Toure Yaya, Gareth Barry, David Silva, Sergio Aguero, Mario Balotelli.

Arsenal’s starting eleven against Everton: Wojciech Szczesny, Johan Djourou, Per Metresacker, Laurent Koscielny, Thomas Vermaelen, Mikel Arteta, Alex Song, Theo Walcott, Aaron Ramsey, Yao Gervinho, Robin Van Persie.

CAMISETA REAL MADRID PORTERO PRIMERA EQUIPACIÓN 2020-2021 Todas las Noticias y Vídeos sobre Fútbol y mucho más, Sigue las Últimas Noticias en Directo.

My whole argument, which I have put forth below, is based on the popular quote of Jack Welch, the former General Electric CEO, saying «An organization’s ability to learn, and translate that learning into action rapidly, is the ultimate competitive advantage.»

The above quote, for me, is a thought-provoking dose that has doped my guts to assess an organization’s ability to learn and translate that learning into action rapidly. I don’t have any ounce of doubt at the ‘Ability’ of some of e-business sectors to translate the learning into action except a word -Rapidly! Although I don’t hold any management degree yet I do understand the significance of the word ‘Rapidly’ in a world where parivartan is taking place faster than the Einsteinian’s e = mc 2. The search driven model on the Internet displays fastest result and then comes user’s experience to click the site. For example, Google, the fastest grown search engine, displays the fastest results (0.05 seconds touches 300 to 700 Google machines across the country).

I’m really impressed with Marissa Mayer, Google’s vice-president for search products, who invalidates the popular adage -slow and steady wins the race -reigned us until web 1.0. It’s speed that encompasses a huge component to drive today’s e-space. To her, speed and web 2.0 go together. If this is true, all e-business has to catch up with speed.

Any e-business model, whether it is B2B, B2C or C2C, horizontal growth over a period of time should never be deemed as a good sign for good prospects for a very long time. An e-business organization has to think -what type of growth it wants -nonlinear horizontal growth or vertical growth? Should it really be happy over its horizontal growth? While its competitors are growing vertically, one can’t keep their fingers crossed. If so, there begins hunky-dory for it!

We are living on the cutting edge of web 2.0 where page views, PR, Meta data, etc. are continuously sweeping down. Search engines are adapting users’ experience. If users’ experience is good, the above parameters to judge the quality of a site from SE perspective become less relevant. Remember, a search engine is users’ driven but not SEO driven. The spider is smart to read the psychology of users and filter the results based on the human query and their quest. Nonetheless, it never means that the SEO as an industry is collapsed. The role of SEO here should be to understand the changing algorithm of SEs to capitalize the return.

The web 1.0 SEO tactic is no longer valid today. The web 2.0 SEO according to me is valid, which is as follows:

Web1.0 SEO tactics vs Web2.0 SEO tactics

Page views Reciprocal Links vs Accessibility

Keyword rich contents vs Interactive Content/user generated content

Meta tags vs Book marking/del.cio.ous/dig/BLs

SE submission vs Automatic Crawling by Spider

Directory submission vs Optional

HTML optimization vs AJAX optimization

Reliability on Search engine PR vs Users’ PR (public relation)/network,

CMS Optimization Aggregation vs Syndication

CMS optimization vs Wikis/Blogs

Now, you can better judge where an organization is –in Web 1.0 (outdated world) or web 2.0 (updated world)! Whether it is progressing horizontally or vertically? SEO as an industry should learn to adapt the changes brought to by web 2.0 to ensure effective service for an organization.

Camiseta PSG 1ª Equipación 2019/2020 La actualidad del futbol de Castilla y León al completo. Todo el fútbol minuto a minuto. Partidos, resultados, jugadores. Fotos y vídeos

Software as a Service (SaaS) is the new generation of ASP model designed to reduce the exorbitant costs of specialized medical practice management software. SaaS model is available for all aspects of medical practice management, including scheduling, billing, and electronic medical records (EMR), which are mission-critical for high quality clinical service, business operations, and regulatory compliance. SaaS model extends the advantages of Application Service Provider (ASP) model, which in turn evolves from the traditional Client-Server model. This article briefly defines key concepts and outlines a set of guidelines for SaaS vendor selection.

Client-Server (CS) Model

CS model involves central servers for database and application logic and multiple client modules connected to the central servers via local area network. This architecture allows allocation of significant application logic on the client computer.

Applications architects considering CS model must weigh performance and security advantages against increased maintenance costs. CS benefits stem from local control of application logic and data. CS shortcomings too stem from localizing logic and data because local arrangement requires the user to take responsibility over application maintenance, including data security, redundancy, disaster recovery, upgrades, backups, etc.

The medical practice utilizing CS model must develop in-house expertise and manage numerous services, including

1. Internet connectivity, bandwidth, and routers
2. Servers for Web server software, email, and firewalls
3. Database management
4. Data feed management
5. Capacity management
6. Redundancy management
7. Application upgrade management

Financially, CS models require the software user to make significant upfront investment in hardware and licensing and justify the business case using ROI-based arguments, which make little sense because of software and hardware innovation pace.

Application Service Provider (ASP) Model

ASP model shields the medical practice from high cost of specialized software and data maintenance responsibilities but not from upfront investment in hardware and in software licenses. Early ASP applications were created from traditional CS applications by moving centralized data and application servers to a third-party hosting service provider and allowing access to the application via HTML user interface as an afterthought. The third-party hosting service provider would take the responsibility for application maintenance and data protection.

The medical practice using early ASP model manages two costs:

1. Licensing and monthly support fee to software vendor
2. Software hosting fee to hosting vendor (typically a «pay-as-you-use model»)

Software as a Service (SaaS) Model

SaaS model extends ASP benefits from outsourcing of system maintenance to simplified financial responsibilities. SaaS vendors eliminate the upfront costs to medical practice by making the upfront investment in hardware and licensing on behalf of all medical practices using the application.

To make such a financial commitment, the hosting vendor must develop thorough expertise in application maintenance and new feature development. Such a requirement became feasible with recent technology progress in terms of security (128-bit SSL encryption) and browser-based client performance along with AJAX coding methodology. The new generation technology now compensates for earlier CS model deficiencies and justifies network-native SaaS software development by design.

Because of higher specialization, SaaS vendor is able to focus on client business requirements, resulting in more responsive service and higher client satisfaction.

SaaS Vendor Selection

Medical practice in search of SaaS vendor must focus on the following topics:

1. Functionality: Does the application deliver all required functionality? Have you documented functional requirements subject to practice business goals, including financial, practice workflow and personnel objectives? Have you considered integrated practice management functionality including patient scheduling, SOAP notes, and billing?
2. Training Plan: Will the vendor provide sufficient training? What drives the training process: practice workflow changes or available software functionality?
3. Third-Party Application Interface: Does the application work with existing applications already deployed in the office? What data exchange requirements must be satisfied if you decide to purchase another application later?
4. Performance: How do you measure application and service performance? Are formal performance metrics available continuously?
5. HIPAA Compliance: What controls are in place to enable access only on a «need to see» basis? Is every access instance logged using secure mechanism?
6. Service Level Agreement: What minimum service levels does the vendor guarantee to the client? What are the penalties for violating SLA?
7. Problem Resolution: Is there a formal process to communicate problem identification and resolution? How is it tracked?
8. Data Access and Ownership: Who owns the data? Keep in mind that according to HIPAA, the patient is the ultimate owner of health data. How secure and private is the connection? Does it have Role based Access Control (RBAC)?
9. Disaster Recovery: How long would it take to recover from a disaster? Is a secondary data center available 24 x 7?
10. Disengagement Procedures: How long is data available upon severing the relationship? Who is responsible for data transfer to the new vendor?

Camiseta Manchester City 2ª Equipación 2019/2020 Últimas noticias sobre Fútbol. Sigue la última hora de LaLiga Santander, la Champions League y toda la actualidad de los equipos

Cristiano Ronaldo who joined Real Madrid this season in in a world record transfer fee from Manchester United, is currently the highest paid football player in the world, after a «Top 50» list was released today.

According to the «Football Finance» site, Cristiano Ronaldo, currently with Real Madrid, is the highest paid footballer in the world. The captain of the Portugal team receives €1.083 million per month, or 13 million euros per year. In 2nd position is the Swede Zlatan Ibrahimovic, of Barcelona, banking one million euros per month (12 million per year) and in 3rd place comes Argentina’s Lionel Messi, captain of the Catalan team, with 875 thousand euros a month or 10.5 million per year.

Spain, England, Italy and Germany are the countries that have the clubs (about a dozen of them) with the best paid players in football today, earning astronomical salaries in an industry that is showing signs of growth once again, with the galactic Real Madrid in the front.

«In a year of recovery after the severe economic crisis that affected most of the clubs, the football industry is showing signs of recovery «begins by saying» the Portuguese marketing agency «Futebol Finance.» For 3 consecutive years, that site has renovated and updated the list with the highest salaries of football players. With major changes in relation to the 2008/09 season – the biggest being the creation of a new «Galactic» team by Real Madrid and the newest millionaires, Manchester City, which has followed the same line of Chelsea, of previous years, considerably inflating salaries paid to the players of the «Premier League.»

With the most expensive transfer ever in football history, Cristiano Ronaldo of Madeira Island, voted best player in the world in 2009, heads the list, ahead of his «rivals» Ibrahimovic and Messi, both of FC Barcelona. According to the table, in 4th place comes the first player who’s not playing in Spain, namely Samuel Eto’o, of Inter Milan, coached by Portuguese José Mourinho. The Brazilian Kaka, teammate of Ronaldo at Bernabeu, takes home 833 thousand euros a month in salary and $10 million per year, composing the «top five.»

Spain and England have the top players

In the «Top 50» appear four more players from Real Madrid Galacticos. They are; Benzema (7), Raul (17), Casillas (22) and Diarra (45), the latter with a monthly salary of 416 thousand euros and five million per year. From Barcelona besides Ibrahimovic and Messi, the list contains six «millionaire» names. These are Henry (11), Xavi (12), Daniel Alves (15), Valdez (23), Puyol (37) and Iniesta (38). Still in Spain there are another three players; Kanoute (Sevilla), at 24. David Villa (Valencia) at 30 and Aguero (Atletico Madrid) at 39.

Camiseta Vapor Match Newell’s Old Boys 1993/94 Accede a todas las noticias del fútbol Internacional. ¡Todo el fútbol internacional, aquí!

Every software company strives to maintain a close relationship with its customers by offering customized solutions to their various requirements. Hence, the role of custom software development has grown in prominence in recent times. During a period when business organizations are making all kinds of efforts to become the industry leaders, a stereotypical product with the same age-old functionalities may curtail their advancing chances.

For securing exclusivity in business goals, custom-made or user-friendly software is the most excellent choice at the moment. The major goal of custom software development is to generate an as precise end-product as demanded by the customer. A tailor-made product must be developed after understanding the requisites and preferences of the client.

Customized packages are devised by making use of the most recent technology. They are exclusively developed to satisfy the customer’s business needs. Any difficulty or disliking of the customer that grows out of the building process can be rectified during the formulation of the software with his/her permission and this is the most important advantage of such package development.

As soon as the system is built and delivered to the client, there may be no requirement to make changes to it since it is already developed to perfection. In case of a ready-made package, a business concern may need to carry out a stringent procedure of reconstituting their goals (usually called configuration) so as to comply with the application (which usually turns out to be very expensive since you are dependent on the product provider for development).

Businesses may need to get in touch with the manufacturer of the product for alterations in the presently existing system to match the necessities. This consumes plenty of precious time, energy and financial resources. The tailor-made product is built eyeing specific requirements of the end users and therefore, the complete custom application development costs need to be paid by one client which does not take place in case of the ready-made software.

After the development stage, custom-made system can be implemented right away because the customer hardly requires any modification in the delivered product. The time invested at the time of building custom system may be greater. However, this must not be an impediment in selecting a customized package for an organization’s particular function. However, the question arises why the software development life cycle goes up during the building phases.

This is because of the fact that the procurement of the ideal tailor-made product demands strict inspection to ensure proper comprehension, analysis and precise execution of thoughts into the final product. In addition, ready-made package may result in lower levels of expenses than custom software development; but, the high expenditure in the latter case takes place only due to profound research and mounting customer demands since the end product needs to be an output sought by the client.

A committed custom application development company always communicates with the client through teleconferencing, telephone, electronic mail or chat, regardless of being onshore or offshore. This is the most crucial activity since the requirements can be transmitted and understood regularly and no possibility for ambiguities is brought forth. Customized software demands frequent communication before as well as after the development stage.

Camiseta Panamá Euro Segunda Equipación 2020/2021 Entra y descubre las novedades sobre jugadores, clubes, fichajes y todo tipo de noticias relacionadas con las competiciones de LaLiga. ¡Vamos!